Franchises are a wonderful way to enter the world of business and make money.
Those who are looking for a tried and tested concept that has been able to yield results for others can rely on a business franchise. However, it’s important to know where to begin, so you don’t make critical mistakes.
How much are you going to end up paying for the franchise?
There are upfront fees along with the amount of money you need as cash flow. If you are not able to show these to the franchisor, you will not receive the rights to own a franchise.
2) Do Your Homework
You need to recognize what the business is about and how its future is looking.
If you are not able to do your homework, it is best not to invest and start a business franchise. It could lead you down a horrific path of wasted funds and needing to hire a West Palm Beach criminal defense lawyer.
3) Meet In Person
You will have to go through an interview when it comes to running a franchise.
Look to prepare yourself and know what it is all about as you pinpoint the next step in your journey.
4) Recognize Demand
It is great to go with Mcdonald’s but is there demand in the region?
You don’t want to pay a high cost for Mcdonald’s and then get ripped off when no one comes to the location. It is important to keep your area in mind beforehand. Even a great franchise can fall apart in the wrong location.
As they say, it’s all about “location, location, location” while running a business.
These are tips you want to consider as you are choosing a business franchise and setting it up for the first time:
Child custody cases are rarely a pleasant experience for anyone. Even when they go smoothly, it still means several people’s lives are thrown into complete disarray. And the fact is that if custody could be decided smoothly, there wouldn’t be a court case.
What this means in practical terms is that it’s important to understand how custody is determined. Now, keep in mind that this is a general explanation. Different states have different laws, and not every judge interprets the same thing the same way. It doesn’t help that some particularly vindictive ex-spouses will make things up just to make the other parent look bad.
Presuming all other things are normal, the court will look at a few different things. One is finances. Having more money doesn’t necessarily mean you’ll win, but it does mean you have the ability to give your child a higher quality of life.
In addition to finances, the court will look at overall stability. How long have you been at your current job? What is your job, and does it provide a steady paycheck? Not so much “does it pay a high amount”, but more “can you reasonably expect to get the same amount at the same time for the foreseeable future”.
Lastly, the court will want to inspect the child’s home life as well as interpersonal relations. This is a difficult one, and is as much a matter of what the court investigator decides as it is about anything you do. It’s difficult, but try to be understanding that Child Protection Services (usually who does the inspection) is underfunded and so can’t offer a paycheck high enough to entice those who would do a good job. And that’s presuming the CPS inspector isn’t weirdly vindictive.
You should speak with an attorney if you want more information about your specific state. Each state is different, and an attorney may be able to find a sympathetic judge, as well.
The United States Constitution is a remarkable document, one that brought together a lot of ideas from different people and even other various documents. The Declaration of Independence was a significant influence, as were the Articles of Confederation. You might have heard the term “founding fathers” before, and they were the individuals that made serious intellectual contributions to the document containing a Bill of Rights and amendment process for the nation to grow with.
Most of these Founding Fathers were present at the Constitutional Convention where the document was created and then ratified. George Washington, the first Constitutional President and Revolutionary War General presided over this gathering. James Madison was also there, and he wrote the specific document that wound up serving as the model for the eventual Constitution.
Some of those who made serious contributions weren’t at the Convention but still helped. Thomas Jefferson authored the influential Declaration of Independence without the help of a Tampa divorce attorney, but at the time was serving abroad in Europe as America’s Ambassador to France. He did maintain correspondence with James Madison though.
John Adams was serving abroad as well, as America’s Ambassador to Great Britain, and wrote a famous defense of the Constution. Thomas Paine likewise wrote “Common Sense,” a pamphlet that was infleuntial on the philosophies reflected by the Declaration of Independence.
Interestingly, one person often labeled a Founding Father, Patrick Henry, was early-on someone who opposed the Constitution. He thought the Articles of Confederation should stay in place, as they ruled the land from the end of the Revolutionary War to the Convention. The agreement to add the first 10 amendments as the Bill of Rights swayed his support.
As you can see, a number of individuals had words and ideas that helped shape the Constitution, but primary authorship is often attributed to James Madison.
The video embedded below shows an in-depth history of the constitution:
Do you ever wonder what the best law schools in America are? If not, you might wonder what situations would ever cause you to think about it, but there are a few that can happen.
For starters, if you are young and considering going to law school, then of course you would want to go to one of the best that is out there, so knowing the best law schools across the nation would help you in picking one of the best ones out there.
Also, if you’re ever faced with a situation where you need an attorney to defend you or represent you in a criminal case or a civil case. You want the best you can get. Their success rate, their charges, and their professional experience all matter, but knowing they went to a great school matters quite a bit, and you can’t know that unless you know which educational institutions are considered the elite.
Of course which of the two situations you’re in will reflect different criteria in what might be considered the best law schools around. Graduation rates and the affordability of tuition could color your opinion much differently if you’re looking for a great school to attend rather than if you’re hunting for someone to represent you.
Fortunately, the Internet abounds with resources listing the schools that are considered the best. You can look for the best in America, the best in your region, and even the best in your state, if your state has multiple legal schools, which isn’t always the case in smaller and rural states. The legal industry reviews itself quite frequently as a way of policing itself, as it knows just how important and critical their profession is to the maintenance of civil society.
Litigation is the process of determining issues through a court trial. But arbitration is a process that is very different from the process of litigation. Most of you may have heard of litigations but not much about arbitrations. No doubt, most of you may have seen an arbitration clause in most of the contracts you have signed or witnessed. In fact, arbitration is the process where two parties to a dispute agree to work with an uninterested third party to resolve a dispute between the two individuals. This article provides information on the difference between litigation and arbitration.
The process of arbitration may employ one or more arbitrators to hear both sides of the case and make a decision accordingly. Even though the litigation process is conducted in an open courtroom in public, arbitration is a private process conducted between the two parties involved in the dispute and the arbitrator. It is informal in nature, though if it includes an intellectual property law firm it can get pretty dull. Arbitration is quick compared to the process of litigation. Once the arbitrator is selected, the process begins. Litigation can take months or even years to complete the case. In fact, the court will give the dates depending on their availability.
The cost of arbitration is inexpensive compared to the cost of litigation. The cost is limited to the fee of the arbitrator depending on the size of the claim, experience of the arbitrator, and other documentation charges. On the other hand, the cost of litigation could be really high which includes the court fees, attorney charges, and other fees. Even though an attorney may represent the parties involved in arbitration, their role is limited compared to an attorney’s role in the process of litigation.
The aforementioned read and following video offer information on the difference between the process of litigation and arbitration.
Over the years there has been some great courtroom scenes in movies such as “A Few Good Men”, “12 Angry Men”, and “A Time To Kill”. For example, in “A Few Good Men”, Tom Cruise (Lt. Daniel Kaffee) defends 2 U.S. Marines in a military courtroom. The 2 Marines are charged with the murder of a fellow Marine. The murder takes place in Cuba at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base.
Lt. Daniel Kaffee takes a risk at the end of the movie and calls the commanding officer of Guantanamo to the witness stand. He does this in an attempt to uncover a conspiracy that the commander is not only aware of but is in charge of. Lt. Daniel Kaffee believes that the conspiracy is what led to the death of the Marine. Jack Nicholson plays the commander and Demi Moore plays a legal assistant.
“12 Angry Men” is a movie from 1957 that takes place in a courtroom and in an adjoining room where the 12 member jury deliberates. This movie is loaded with stars from that era including Henry Fonda, Martin Balsam, and Lee J Cobb. Though it is an older movie it provides and excellent explanation an examination of the U.S. jury system.
A “Time To Kill” is a drama thriller that features M. McConaughey, S. Bullock, K. Sutherland, K. Spacey, D. Sutherland, A. Judd, and Samuel L Jackson. Samuel Jackson plays a brokenhearted father who is out to avenge the brutal rape of his young daughter. This movie takes place in a small segregated southern town that has a history of racial violence.
The above are just a few of the excellent movies that contain courtroom and legal drama but there are many others such as Erin Brockovich, The Rainmaker, Runaway Jury, and A Civil Action.
For many years, the popularity of courtroom TV shows has been on the rise. In this article, we will talk about some of the best courtroom TV shows to be put on broadcast.
1. Judge Judy
One of the most popular, if not the most popular, courtroom TV shows is Judge Judy. This show follows Judith Sheindlin, and has been on television since the year of 2016. Judge Judy is known for her quick wit and tough love when dealing with those who bring cases before her. You don’t need to be a Kansas City Missouri personal injury attorney to understand that this show is hilarious!
2. The People’s Court
Another excellent courtroom TV show is The People’s Court, which follows the cases brought before Judge Marilyn Milian. The series has been on television since the year of 1981, with Judge Milian presiding over the courtroom since the year of 2001.
3. Divorce Court
One of the best courtroom TV shows is Divorce Court, which originally made its way to television in the year 1957. Today, Judge Lynn Toler handles the cases brought onto the show. The show follows soon-to-be exes who bring their stories before Judge Toler before they finalize their divorce from each other. Judge Toler will hear each side and then rule/settle the case by the end of the episode.
4. Hot Bench
This television show is a little different from the others in the sense that instead of one judge hearing each case, there are three. Hot Bench has been on television since 2014 and was created by none other than Judge Judith Sheindlin. After the panel of judges hears each side, they discuss the facts of the case with each other before settling on a verdict.
In conclusion, there are many excellent courtroom television shows being broadcast today, but these mentioned here today are the best in terms of popularity and ratings. If you have not watched an episode of these shows, we highly recommend it. You won’t be disappointed!
The short answer to this question is yes. You can sue someone from another country just as you can be sued in the United States by someone from another country. There are some laws in the US that pertain to libel and slander.
If you were involved in a libel or slander case your best bet would be to sue the individual in the country in which they live. This is because US slander and libel laws tend to be the most favorable towards defendants. If you sued in the US, the defendant would likely win the case or it would be dismissed.
As for other legal situations, you can hire a lawyer in the country where the defendant lives to get a case started. This can be costly, but you can always research qualified attorneys online to find the right person to handle your case. If you cannot find any other means to solving your issue with the other party, you may find that investing money in a lawsuit overseas is worthwhile.
Suing a person in another country can be expensive. You could also try filing the case in the US. The defendant would likely have to pay to defend their case and pay to show up in court should the case reach a trial.
If at all possible, you want to resolve any issues you have with people outside your country by other means first. If you cannot reach a conclusion and there is enough of a potential judgment that you could be awarded, you might want to go ahead and file a suit in the person’s country of residence.
The best thing to do is to speak with an attorney in the area of law that applies to your case. They can help you determine if it is a good idea to pursue a lawsuit out of the country.
Do you ever wonder just what is an expert witness? If you’ve ever seen a court trial in person or watched legal dramas on television or in movies, then you know that sometimes, someone is called to the stand as what is called an ‘expert witness.’ Do you ever wonder what makes them different from other witnesses?
The legal definition might vary a bit from one jurisdiction to the next, but in general, an expert witness is one who is brought in for analysis and explanation of something that happened. They have to have demonstrated proficiency, experience, or knowledge within a certain field, and those skills or education must be recognized by the judge in order to allow for the designation of the status of expert witness.
Most witnesses called to the stand are by definition someone that witnessed something that is related to the case the prosecution is building or the defense is arguing. Many witnesses were either at the scene of an incident in question or possibly knew a person involved. They generally have some kind of connection to the case at a personal or professional level and are there to answer questions about what they personally know, saw, did, etc.
An expert witness rarely has a personal connection to a case, as their objectivity usually is necessary to not influence the emotions of a jury. In highly technical cases involving technology, science, medicine, or many other things, an expert witness might be necessary for a jury to understand complicated factors of the case.
That can help a Corpus Christi personal injury attorney win the minds of jurors, but it might not help them win their hearts. That’s particularly true given that more and more people know there are some individuals who make a living as expert witnesses, and their testimony is often highly prepared with the prosecution.
This video explains the role of an expert witness in a bit more depth:
Do you ever wonder how are juries selected in courtrooms? If you’re ever charged with a crime and put on trial, this will definitely be something that you are curious about. You might also wonder about it if you file a civil lawsuit or have one filed against you. It’s more likely that you get curious about this if you receive a dreaded jury summons in the mail.
The specifics of jury selection do vary based on every jurisdiction, and given that there are federal, state, and municipal level courts, there are thousands of possible variations. However, there are many things that run rather standard across America.
In general, many courthouses know in advance how many cases they might have starting on a particular date, as hearings are scheduled in advance, sometimes by weeks or months. A pool of potential jurors is often formed up to serve several different cases. Databases are done differently in each location, but voter registration rolls, DMV records, and property tax records are often used.
Many summoned jurors never even make it into a courtroom, as plenty are picked, and last-minute settlements or plea deals are struck to avoid trials. If a case does start, then a judge has general instructions for prospective jurors. In most cases, the prosecutor or lawyer for the plaintiff asks questions of a group of jurors, followed by the defense attorney. Together, these two lawyers try to agree to a group of jurors that seem fair to both sides of a possible trial.
Some cases warrant having more than the usual 12 jurors, as there might be a number of alternates. This is done to make sure the trial proceeds even a juror gets sick, dies, or is otherwise disqualified from the case.