Can You Sue If You Spill Coffee On Yourself?

One of the most famous lawsuits in history is the hot coffee lawsuit. The suit, which was filed after a woman was burned by McDonald’s coffee, is often used as an example of frivolous lawsuits.

If you’re familiar with this case, you may be wondering what this says about civil law. Can you really sue if you spill coffee on yourself?

It’s important to note that the circumstances of the hot coffee lawsuit are extremely unusual. The woman in question didn’t just spill coffee on herself and call a lawyer. The McDonald’s that she bought her coffee from was serving coffee that was boiling hot. The restaurant had been warned about the temperature of their coffee before, but they failed to heed the warning.

The woman burned herself when she was holding the styrofoam cup of coffee between her legs. The coffee was so hot that it actually melted through the cup. She had severe third-degree burns on her legs, and she sued McDonald’s in order to cover her medical bills. The case only went to court because McDonald’s refused to settle with the woman. After she won her case, McDonald’s changed their practices.

Simply spilling coffee on yourself isn’t enough to justify hiring a Marietta personal injury attorney. If you want to file a case, you need to show that the restaurant was negligent in some way. If you have reason to believe that the coffee you spilled on yourself was served at a dangerously hot temperature, you might have a case.

There is a lot of misinformation about civil lawsuits, and the hot coffee case is a great example of that. While you may believe that the lawsuit was frivolous, the woman actually had a very strong case. Most of the time, people that spill coffee on themselves can’t take the case to court.

If you would like to learn more about the McDonalds’ Hot Coffee Case, please check out the following video:

What Is Illegal In The Courtroom?

Going to the courtroom is one of the hardest things for those who have never done it before.

If you have never been in the courtroom, it is important to brush up on what is allowed and what is not. Several acts are deemed “illegal” in the courthouse and therefore should be avoided at all cost unless you want to be jailed or fined.

Here are some of the acts that are deemed illegal when it comes to visiting the courthouse in your state.

1) Breaking Courtroom Decorum

This can include something as simple as not standing up when a judge arrives but can be as severe as yelling at the top of your lungs.

While a judge will be lenient to the former, they will not be to the latter as it is direct contempt of court and illegal. The same applies to using your cell phone or recording the proceedings at any stage without permission.

2) Tampering With Witnesses or Evidence

This is against the law and is not allowed.

It is important not to speak to the witness outside the courtroom as that can be construed as trying to influence them. If found guilty, there are additional charges that can be placed on you along with what is already in place.

It will also weaken your case in the courtroom.

The same applies to those who try to tamper with evidence.

3) Eating, Smoking, Drinking

Depending on the severity of what you are doing, this is illegal and not allowed in the courtroom.

A special area is created for those who wish to eat outside the courtroom, and it is best to head over there. Otherwise, you are not allowed to eat, smoke, or drink inside the courtroom at any stage.

Keep these in mind before you enter the courtroom.

What States Have The Most Expensive Lawyers?

We all know that the cost of a legal defense team can be rather expensive. Although, if you are wanting to steer clear of fines and jail time, it is a necessary evil in life. However, have you ever wondered which states have the highest cost when it comes to defending yourself in the American justice system? We decided we would do a little research and find three of the most expensive states when it comes to lawyer fees. Let’s just hope that if you are looking for a lawyer you do not live in one of these states!

It should come as little surprise that the state of California has some of the highest lawyer fees in the United States, especially if you want to hire a Los Angeles personal injury attorney. New York follows after California, which again should be understandable, especially for those who live in the state. However, the state that does come as surprise for high legal fees is that of Delaware. Who would have thought that such a small state would hold such high attorney fees?

Finally, while it is not a state, one would find the highest attorney fees in the United States in no other than Washington D.C. If you are looking to make a lot of money in the legal profession, one of those four areas would make an excellent choice. If you have a case in one of those areas, you may look for other options such as legal aid.

Of course, these fees are not 100% guaranteed. In many cases, the type of case is going to determine the overall cost of the case and lawyer. If you are fearful of the cost being too much to handle, it is best to look into other options. Depending on the case, the lawyer may be able to work out some form of payment plan or other option.

If you would like to learn some more about expensive lawyers, please watch the following video:

Appealing A Court Decision Or Judgement

When you go to court the judge or the jury make’s a decision. And you have the right to have that judgment be reviewed – that’s called filing an appeal. A brand new court called the appeals court will review what happened during your initial trial and will determine if there were any errors of law. If there was an error that contributed to your judge or jury’s decision, that will reverse it.

An appeal is a review of the trial court’s application of law, meaning did the judge make the correct rulings on motions and objections. An appeal is heard by several judges depending on jurisdiction. Currently, there are 9 judges serving in the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. The process is filing an appellate brief to the appeals court that explains how the judge incorrectly applied the law. The appellate judges take the briefs, court documents, and records, and listen to oral arguments to determine if the decision should be reversed.