Legal Challenge Alleges That Pennsylvania’s Pollution Plan Is Outdated

A new lawsuit is taking aim at the recent EPA approval of a Pennsylvania plan it says is outdated. The Environmental Protection Agency was subject to significant cutbacks during the Trump administration — the head of the EPA notably didn’t even believe in man-made climate change, which made him a strange choice to help fight it — and those cutbacks haven’t yet been completely rectified by the Biden administration.

The lawsuit was filed by the Center for Biological Diversity and says that Pennsylvania’s plan for dealing with pollution is outdated at best.

Senior Attorney for the Center for Biological Diversity Robert Ukeiley said, “Rubber-stamping weak and outdated measures that fail to control pollution from the methane gas industry is not how we’re going to transition to a clean energy economy. The EPA needs to ensure it’s requiring the best, most modern technology to control pollution from fossil fuels so the cost of dirty energy pollution is internalized and the economic playing field for clean energy is leveled.”

According to the EPA, Pennsylvania state is subject to increased ozone pollution, a type of smog associated with asthma, death, increased life span, and significant ecological and environmental damage. The pollution isn’t contained just to the state, though, and contributes to smog in other states downwind. 

The lawsuit said that Pennsylvania’s current standards have led to consistent violations of national standards.

Pollution affects minority populations disproportionately, turning the lawsuit into a race issue as well. 

Residential areas prone to increased smog see more ER visits, more school absences, more prescribed medications, and a higher incidence of death. The lawsuit also contends that the increased pollution has worsened the symptoms of COVID-19, making the pandemic hit Pennsylvania harder than it had to. 

Patients with underlying conditions like asthma are also more prone to serious complications from COVID-19, a disease caused by the novel coronavirus.

Pennsylvania Residents Fear IRS Audit After Unemployment Errors

In the summer of 2020, Annette Ravinsky received two checks totalling almost $10,000 — which was a surprise, since she hadn’t requested any state or federal aid due to coronavirus-related financial worries. Thankfully, Ravinsky knew she didn’t qualify and didn’t cash the checks. After all, she hadn’t worked in nearly three decades. She called the Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry to report potential fraud.

And she returned the checks. The department noted that the case was closed and to expect no further troubles. Ravinsky also asked an attorney how to proceed. She thought the entire process went smoothly, even if it was somewhat of an inconvenience.

But that wasn’t the end of her problems. She and 50,000 others reported unemployment or social security benefit fraud to the IRS. None of these people were made aware that Pennsylvania state authorities would still report the returned fraudulent checks as income to the Internal Revenue Service.

Ravinsky said of the ordeal, “I am very, very, very angry right now because I did not ask for any of this. The state had a responsibility to verify. Now, I am left holding the bag.”

And it gets even worse, because some people did apply for benefits — but couldn’t access the funds due to glitches in Pennsylvania websites. Just like those who reported tax fraud, these people still owe taxes on that money. And they have no way of paying.

Attorney Sharon Dietrich with Community Legal Services in Philadelphia said, “It is sort of like the cherry on top of the whole [Pandemic Unemployment Assistance] crisis. You don’t get the money plus you get screwed with the IRS.”

Many of the victims of these combined glitches and fraud are retired senior citizens, Ravinsky included. Nancy Sweetland is an 82-year-old who filed for financial assistance in April last year. The debit card she received from Pennsylvania State was requisitioned through United States Bank, but arrived defective due to one of the aforementioned glitches. She could not move money around using the card, nor could she use it to make purchases.

Phone lines over at the Labor and Industry department were constantly flooded with calls, and Sweetland failed to get through to anymore. Her messages were unanswered. According to the tax formed she received in the mail earlier this year, the account for the debit card was subject to $18,000 worth of benefits — and she would be taxed on all of them. 

Sweetland said, “Any email address that I ran across I sent [an email] to and I never got a response. I am just kind of at my wits’ end.”

Other state residents have received tax statements that show payments in excess of what they actually received. 

Audit investigation supervisor Susan Mease emailed a reply to Sandy Kolenda after Kolenda noted one such problem: “So you did receive [the checks], not sure if you have them and just never cashed them.”

Kolenda said, “I was crying. What do you do? I am one person up against the Department of Labor and Industry. It is incredibly frustrating and scary.”

Pennsylvania Constitution Fast-Track Amendment Planned In Response To Child Abuse

A statute of limitations is a “cap” placed on certain times of criminal or civil litigation. Have a personal injury or medical malpractice claim? Then you only have a few years to file a lawsuit due to the short statute of limitations. By comparison, there is no statute of limitations on criminal liability for the commission of a murder. Many Pennsylvania residents and legislators are looking to amend the state constitution to provide more time to victims of child sexual abuse to come forward.

This is because victims often suffer abuse when they are children, which makes coming forward to make a claim before the statute of limitations runs out even more unlikely.

Representative Mark Rozzi (D-Berks) said that he hopes a bipartisan resolution to amend the state constitution will pass with significant numbers. “We’ll be able to pass a standalone quickly and get this on the May ballot as originally intended,” he said.

Rozzi has reason to feel so strongly about the passage of this amendment: he was allegedly raped by a priest when he was only thirteen years old. 

Jenn Kocher, a spokesman for GOP-majority Senate President Pro Tempore Jake Corman, said, “As always, we look forward to reviewing any plan the House is able to pass over to the Senate and that includes an emergency constitutional amendment.”

Pennsylvania state law gives many victims a significant window in which to file charges or a lawsuit, but not necessarily within the timeframe of adulthood — which is when most victims choose to step forward. The law closes that window at ages 18, 20, or 30. 

The amendment would give them a two-year reprieve.

Pennsylvania lawyer Ben Andreozzi said, “Those victims are literally at the mercy of the Pennsylvania Legislature.”

An emergency amendment wouldn’t even be possible if it weren’t for voters, who approved its during a vote in 1967.

Lawsuits Planned In Pennsylvania Amidst Social Security Scams And Benefits Interruptions

COVID-19 has devastated many hard-working Americans. Some have been laid off. Some have lost businesses. Others have lost loved one. But the long-term toll is probably greater than most realize. Because so many people are out of work, the average person will have to pay into Social Security for longer to receive a larger benefit. Coupled with the rise of scams, and you can understand why officials are so concerned.

Last year, Pennsylvania State Attorney General Josh Shapiro issued a statement: “This Consumer Protection Week, my Office is warning consumers that scam artists are out in full force, employing new tactics to achieve their same nefarious goals. I urge Pennsylvanians to be vigilant of this scam and, if you believe that you have been victimized, please contact my Office immediately. We are here to protect you, and we are working hard to put an end to these scams.”

Notably, the number of con artists are on the rise since the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic — in part because they feed upon the financially exigent. Those who are already facing financial ruin are far more likely to fall prey to the scams.

A glitch in the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance program has left many Pennsylvania residents confused and angry — especially after a series of glitches caused many to be paid accidentally. Some of these overpayments ran in the thousands of dollars. When officials realized what had happened, many weekly payments were reduced. This made it harder for residents who had already spent the first round.

Janice Roundtree said, “I’m really glad there was a moratorium on the utilities because I don’t know how we would have survived if they hadn’t done that. We would have had to be in some shelter or something.”

A subsequent Keystone Crossroads Investigation said that the website for such assistance had glitched out, leading to billions of dollars in overpaying — but more importantly, the system was unable to cope with the traffic increase, which led those subjected to the glitch without any way to receive new information. 

Community Legal Services litigation direction Sharon Dietrich said, “It was kind of shocking as PUA rolled out how many problems were connected to GSI.” Dietrich’s office also said that the program’s operation was led in an “unconstitutional and illegal manner,” especially after benefits were cut off without any first notifying affected residents.

Social Security is a federal benefit, which means where you live won’t have any real impact on your ability to receive that benefit (as long as you’ve paid into the pool like everyone else by working and paying taxes each year). For example, there wouldn’t be any difference in how you would apply to receive your Los Angeles Social Security benefit or your Philadelphia Social Security benefit. They work the same way. But each state has its own system to provide COVID-19 benefits to its systems in addition to federal aid, which means each system is subject to succeed or fail — on its own.

Now, a round of litigation is expected due to Pennsylvania’s failed response.

Supreme Court Once Again Asked To Block Election Results; Says “No”

The Supreme Court did not have much to say after an earlier request once again asked the highest power in the United States to block election results in Pennsylvania — in fact, they provided only a one-sentence answer in response. Reportedly, none of the justices dissented. That includes each of the three justices appointed by Donald Trump, who will soon be on his way out of office of the presidency.

This has prompted the president’s critics to lambast him for continuing to not accept the results of a fair and lawful election, suggesting that he’s even been laughed out of the Supreme Court with dozens of frivolous lawsuits. In the runup to the election, Trump’s team lost upwards of 50 challenges to the election results and the way votes were tabulated. 

Philadelphia federal appellate Judge Stephanos Bibas wrote during his rebuke of one such challenge: “Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here…Voters, not lawyers, choose the president. Ballots, not briefs, decide elections.”

The presumption is that Trump knows he lost the election — but refuses to admit it because there are still legal avenues that could produce results. But the courts aren’t having any of it. 

A similar response from the Arizona Supreme Court said Trump’s supporters failed “to present any evidence of ‘misconduct,’ ‘illegal votes’ or that the Biden electors ‘did not in fact receive the highest number of votes for office,’ let alone establish any degree of fraud of a sufficient error rate that would undermine the certainty of the election results.”

A Texas lawsuit was similarly called crazy. Stephen I. Vladeck at the University of Texas tweeted: “It looks like we have a new leader in the ‘craziest lawsuit filed to purportedly challenge the election’ category.”

How Should Pennsylvania Legislators Approach Driverless Vehicle Laws?

Full autonomy sounds like a pipe dream, but if car manufacturers are telling us the truth then driverless vehicles are not so far from being made a reality. Tesla’s Elon Musk has already provided us with the first glimpses of this reality — even though lawmakers have struggled to play catch up when adopting new rules and regulations to govern these new technologically advanced vehicles and their drivers.

How Pennsylvania legislators might continue to approach writing laws for driverless vehicles is still up in the air, but we can look to car accidents Socal for a decent idea of what they might do. Several questions might come to mind: Who is liable for personal injury or property damages — the driver, dealer, manufacturer, or mechanic? Do you even send a vehicle like this to a mechanic? 

You might not realize it, but these questions have been asked and answered around the world already — even if our own legislators aren’t ready to pull the trigger with similar laws. Another thing you might not realize is that our own home state of Pennsylvania is a major hub for the autonomous vehicle industry!

Founder of Pittsburgh Robotics Network Jackie Erickson said, “You can’t just take a vehicle and have it navigate safely on public roads overnight. It takes a very long time. We’ve been working on this problem in Pittsburgh for 30 years.”

Carnegie Mellon University professor of electrical and computer engineering Raj Rajkumar said, “Driving is the most complex activity we engage in.”

Rajkumar said that he believed Pittsburgh is “the birthplace of AV technology.”

Pittsburgh has been working on this technology for longer than everyone else because the city is deeply integrated with developing space-related technology — and that means autonomous rovers and the like, especially when considering ground-based vehicles. But companies still researching these technologies are growing faster due to new cash investments from even bigger companies who require the expertise. 

Startups like Aurora, Argo AI, and Uber ATG are all growing at an exponential rate.

Aurora Vice President Gerardo Interiano noted that ATG will soon be joining his own company: “We went from having 600 employees to now 1600 employees.”

Pittsburgh Regional Alliance Vice President Kyle Chintalapalli said, “We anticipated consolidation as being inevitable. What we were encouraged by is that it wasn’t just a buy-out, [it was] more an investment in Aurora’s growth…It speaks to the strength of the robust ecosystem here.”

But there are other factors slowing down growth. AV testing laws in Pennsylvania still require a human operator — which makes sense because the state is subject to very diverse weather patterns unlike locations outside Los Angeles or Las Vegas.

PennDOT Office of Transformational Technology Director Mark Kopko said, “Even if something goes wrong, you still have the trained operator who has the caliber to take control. It’s something the industry is behind.”

Even Tesla’s new automated systems require a human operator, even though Elon Musk has said the technology is nearly ready to take over completely. But even when the technology is ready, the laws aren’t.

Trump Still Attempting To Overturn Pennsylvania Election Results

Nearly two months after Election Day turned the tide of power in our government, soon to be former president Donald Trump is still playing politics — and desperate to overturn results on the basis of widespread voter fraud that never existed. Lawsuit after lawsuit has failed, and the Supreme Court has completely ignored his requests for its justices to intervene or do his bidding. Meanwhile, Trump is pardoning everyone in sight and talking to his most radical supporters about invoking martial law.

And he’s also lodged one last lawsuit in Pennsylvania — even though overturning the results there wouldn’t do a thing to help him retain the presidency unless he can do it elsewhere as well. And his chances of being successful are basically nonexistent. 

The current suit requests a reversal of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s earlier three decisions which attempted to overturn legal votes on the basis of signature verification, observation of vote counts on Election Day, and mail-in votes. The state court ruled on these issues. The lawsuit says that only the state legislature has the authority to do so. But, you know, the United States of America has always had this small issue of checks and balances in place to prevent someone like Trump from completely destroying our democracy.

Trump attorney John Eastman wrote, “Collectively, these three decisions resulted in counting approximately 2.6 million mail ballots in violation of the law as enacted by the Pennsylvania Legislature.”

He continued, “The outcome of the election for the Presidency of the United States hangs in the balance.”

“Indeed, the intense national and worldwide attention on the 2020 Presidential election only foreshadows the disruption that may well follow if the uncertainty and unfairness shrouding this election are allowed to persist,” he wrote.

These arguments are false, as were all the others. That’s why they keep failing. Joe Biden is our next president — and he was elected lawfully by an enormous margin.

A Parallel Universe: Donald Trump’s Lawsuit To Hold The Presidency

Ignoring for a moment what actually happened on Election Day — and what actually could happen in the future — we want to take a moment to explore two of many potential paths that we believe were the most likely to have unfolded. One follows Joe Biden after an historic victory that could not be doubted. The other follows Donald Trump, who used the structure of our own government to steal an election he lost — both through the popular vote and electoral college — to ignore what was to be Joe Biden’s shining moment.

For the first scenario to unfold, what needed to happen was simple: a landslide victory on Election Day. Why? Because the Trump strategy was all about throwing out any votes after Election Day (most of which would predictably have been blue) in order to keep what looked like an Election Day electoral college victory from turning into a defeat when all the votes were counted. 

A landslide would prevent such a reality from transpiring. Biden would need purple states like Texas to really seal the deal when it mattered most. Waiting for a win weeks later would be dangerous. 

And as for the second scenario, perhaps originally seen as even more likely as the first, there’s the obvious question: how could Trump possibly get away with throwing away votes? Oddly enough, it’s one of the only truly scandalous actions he could take during his presidency that would actually be legal. It would have Super NOVA like consequences of course, but they might even seem like business as usual nowadays.

The plot has to do with who controls state legislatures in the vast majority of swing states. Who does, you ask? Republicans. And therein lies the problem. Even before the election took place, they publicly announced plans to send electors to vote for Trump over Biden if they thought that best represented the outcome of the popular vote in their own states. In other words, even if Biden got the votes needed to win the electors in that state, the legislature would cry foul based on non-existent fraudulent voting, and then send the electors to vote for Trump anyway.

That’s how a once-proud Democracy dies. The worst part? GOP constituents openly acknowledge that they receive most of their news directly from the president himself. In other words, they believe everything that comes out of his mouth. Everyone on the other side of the aisle knows he’s lying — because 99 percent of the time he’s caught on camera or in print doing it — but what really matters most is the people who don’t know. Because those are the people who wanted to vote for him, and those are the people who were willing to throw away Democratic tradition to keep him in power for another four years.

The Democratic process, then, in this scenario, would place its success or failure on entities like the Republican-controlled Senate or the Conservative-led Supreme Court. Three of the nine members of the Supreme Court were nominated by Trump. Would they ever really threaten his presidency, dually elected or not?

What Are Authorities Doing To Protect Against Voter Fraud In Pennsylvania?

Supporters of Donald Trump — and viewers of Fox News, especially — have continued to believe in the notion of widespread voter fraud even though Trump’s own FBI director has suggested there is little evidence of it. Additionally, bipartisan groups have also continued to find little evidence of voter fraud, save for a few dozen cases over the years. But Trump and Fox News continue to roll out new “evidence” of this non-existent phenomenon.

In fact, a new Trump Administration lawsuit used Philadelphia resident and lawyer Adam Goodman’s selfie to suggest that voter fraud is pervasive in Pennsylvania. Trump has also set up cameras at many dropboxes, which is tantamount to intimidation and may be against the law. Why was Goodman’s photo “evidence” of voter fraud? Because there were two ballots when he dropped them off during primary season.

But it’s not illegal to drop off more than one vote — because you’re allowed to drop off another person’s vote if you’re unable to do it yourself. With coronavirus still a huge issue during this election, it’s not surprising that people might be more inclined to appoint a surrogate. 

Goodman said his husband “was wearing sweatpants and didn’t think he looked cute enough for Instagram. You can’t see it in the photo, but we are actually both holding up the ballots.” 

Court documents described many images of one person dropping off more than one vote as evidence of “rampant problems and associated fraud in Pennsylvania’s 2020 primary election” and that they “undermine the integrity of the 2020 general election.”

Goodman said, “God forbid the election becomes contested. I am going to vote in person. We have our ballots, and we are going to surrender them on Election Day and vote at the polls. It’s crazy to me the lengths that this administration is going to in order to discredit the results of this election. I mean, my Instagram?”

The Trump Administration certainly knows that these pictures do not amount to evidence of voter fraud — but then again, that may not be the point. Sometimes, public opinion matters more.

Can A Company Sue You For Unpaid Credit Card Debt?

We’ve all heard the story by now: the vast majority of Americans cannot afford an even minor unexpected expense. We’re living paycheck to paycheck. Sometimes, we have to use our plastic to pay for goods and services even when we’d rather use cash. Credit card companies have taken advantage of this formula for decades, sprinkling interest on top of already massive bills. But what happens when you can’t pay back your credit card debt.

Yes, your credit card company can sue you.

The truth is, though, that they’d rather not. Going to the trouble of suing someone for debt they can’t afford is often more trouble than it’s worth. But if a credit card company investigates your circumstances and finds that you might be able to pay off your credit card debt — but for some reason won’t — then it will likely propose litigation against you to recoup their own investments. That’s just the way business works. 

One thing to keep in mind if you’re worried that your credit card company might initiate a lawsuit is that they can’t do it right away. There’s no reason to sweat bullets the first time you default on a payment. There might be reason to worry, however, if you go months and months without being able to afford the bill. The shortest timetable for a company usually falls around six months. 

It is extremely important to take any notification of a lawsuit seriously. You might be summoned to court. If you ignore a court summons, then in the best case scenario a default judgment will be awarded to the credit card company suing you. In the worst case scenario, a bench warrant could be put out for your arrest. Never ignore the problem. 

Also, keep in mind that there are people out there who go to the trouble of purchasing your debt from the credit card company owed — meaning they pay at least some portion of the debt owed — and then set out to sue you to recoup the money they paid (and then some, of course).

Before you take any further action, request a verification of debt owed. The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act allows you to make this formal request in writing, at which point a debt collector must furnish you with proof that the debt is owed. This is more important when the debt has been purchased by a third-party.

Next, decide how to address what you owe. A settlement is probably in your best interest if you cannot afford the debt, because it will allow you to mitigate costs. But keep in mind you will still owe any settlement costs remaining, and failing to pay could land you in hotter water. Settling debt will likely leave you with a much reduced credit score that could last for years.

And that means the best option is simply paying off the debt in full. Sit down with a lawyer to ask about debt management plans and additional options.